GENIUS Six-months Review Teleconf, 30th May 2014 10:00 - 11:00 CEST
The goal of this teleconference is to review the status of GENIUS after the initial 6-month set-up period. We will review the deliverables and milestones (X. Luri / L. Balaguer) and we will then do a quick review of the status of each WP (managers). Additionally, we will discuss the Vienna plenary meeting and define the GENIUS splinter meeting on Tuesday afternoon.
You can follow the telecon-
https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=M66J1IKIO8J9WKL1LXZQXB780K-48Z1
From now on we aim to have monthly teleconferences like this one to track the progress of the project.
Agenda
- Introduction and general update (X. Luri, L. Balaguer)
- WP100 - Management (X. Luri)
- WP200 User community (A. Brown)
- WP400 Data exploitation (X. Luri, UB)
- CSIC (E. Solano Marquez)
- FFCUL (A. Moitinho)
- UBR (M. Taylor)
- CNRS (F. Arenou)
- WP600 Support (X. Luri, UB)
- CESCA (T. Via)
- UCAM (N. Walton)
- WP700 Dissemination (X. Luri, UB)
Actions
- ALL: Review deliverables page and send a small report when a delivery is due or when a delay is necessary.
- ALL: Try to take into account that we need to keep our contracts with around a 20% of women.
- ALL: Fill the Reporting pages with the activities you develop. Next deadline next week!
- NW: send a Partnership Agreement template/model to XL
- ALL: Suggestions for the External Advisory Board still needed.
- AM: Send a formal report of activities on 420.
- ALL: Check new website and project portal and send comments to TV
- LB: Open a doodle for next telecon at the end of June
Conclusions
- An effort to get a GREAT meeting dedicated to Gaia User Community Requirements/Cases
- Search for a formal & technical agreement of collaboration between NanoJasmine and Gaia in Validation as well as in complementarity of catalogues.
- Once the Gaia commission stage is finished and a new schedule is in place, we will proceed to formally require a delay on the relevant deliverables (Science Alerts prototypes 2-3 months probably).